1672-8505

CN 51-1675/C

《春秋胡传》和宋元明科举

Hu Anguo's Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals and Imperial Examinations of the Song, Yuan and Ming Dynasties

  • 摘要: 胡安国是南宋理学的开创者, 其理学紧密结合国家的现实危难, 所上《时政论》亦有学理价值。此外, 胡安国还是湖湘学派的创立者。胡安国是宋代春秋学史上的杰出人物。尊奉孟子、庄周、董仲舒、王通、邵雍、张载和程颐共七家之学说为撰述纲领, 这是胡安国标举的思想旗帜。直接地取法董仲舒的《春秋繁露》来著书, 这是胡安国采取的撰述策略。胡安国对宋元明时期的科举考试影响巨大, 《春秋胡传》成了考试指南。胡安国欲以自己的著作来顶替《左传》, 这一点他没有办到。尽管《春秋胡传》具有理学的深刻性, 但它却缺少史传文学的情节性和生动性。

     

    Abstract: Hu Anguo was the founder of both Huxiang School of Thought and Neo Confucianism in the Southern Song Dynasty. His Neo-Confucianism theories were closely related to the real threats to the country, and his On Current Politics is also of NeoConfucianism value. Besides, he was an outstanding personage in the studies of The Spring and Autumn Annals in Song Dynasty. He organized Commentary with the principles from seven forerunners, namely, Mencius, Zhuang Zhou, Dong Zhongshu, Wang Tong, Shao Yong, Zhang Zai and Cheng Yi, and imitated the writing of Luxuriant Dew of the Spring and Autumn Annuals by Dong Zhongshu. Owing to his great influence on imperial examinations then, Commentary became the guide to imperial examinations in Song, Yuan and Ming Dynasties. He even tried to replace Tso Chuan with it, but failed due to its lack of plots and vivid description in historical and biographic literature, despite its profoundness of Neo-Confucianism.

     

/

返回文章
返回