1672-8505

CN 51-1675/C

刘欢,唐瑶. 收入不平等与中国老年人非正式照料—基于CLHLS两期追踪调查数据的研究[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,39(6):48 − 59 . doi: 10.12189/j.issn.1672-8505.2020.06.005
引用本文: 刘欢,唐瑶. 收入不平等与中国老年人非正式照料—基于CLHLS两期追踪调查数据的研究[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,39(6):48 − 59 . doi: 10.12189/j.issn.1672-8505.2020.06.005
LIU Huan, TANG Yao. Income Inequality and Informal Care of the Elderly in ChinaA Research on Two Follow-up Survey Data Based on CLHLS[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences) , 2020, 39(6): 48-59. DOI: 10.12189/j.issn.1672-8505.2020.06.005
Citation: LIU Huan, TANG Yao. Income Inequality and Informal Care of the Elderly in ChinaA Research on Two Follow-up Survey Data Based on CLHLS[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences) , 2020, 39(6): 48-59. DOI: 10.12189/j.issn.1672-8505.2020.06.005

收入不平等与中国老年人非正式照料基于CLHLS两期追踪调查数据的研究

Income Inequality and Informal Care of the Elderly in ChinaA Research on Two Follow-up Survey Data Based on CLHLS

  • 摘要: 伴随老龄人口的快速增长,如何更好地满足老年人长期照料需求正日益成为重要的社会议题。文章基于2014年、2018年CLHLS连续追踪调查数据,运用双边随机前沿模型,实证检验了老年人非正式照料影响因素,并估计了收入不平等对老年人非正式照料的影响程度。结果表明,家庭收入对数、由退休金或子女提供经济支持、丧偶、失能程度等显著正向影响老年人非正式照料基准量,而社区提供健康教育显著负向降低老年人非正式照料基准量。在具体效应方面,收入不平等综合影响比重达到了76.86%,其中,收入不平等正向溢出效应贡献了88.66%。在影响程度的单边效应方面,收入不平等正向溢出效应高达58.12%,负向挤出效应为33.33%,净效应达到了24.79%。性别和地区特征下的群体异质性较小,但伴随老年人失能等级提升,收入不平等净效应呈现降低趋势。因此,根据收入不平等形成机制,以提升老年人照料水平为导向,文章提出降低收入不平等、优化正式照料资源供给、强化制度保障等政策建议。

     

    Abstract: With the rapid increasing of the elderly population, how to better meet the long-term care needs of the elderly is becoming an increasingly important social issue. Based on the CLHLS continuous tracking survey data from 2014 to 2018, this article uses SFA to test empirically the influencing factors of informal care for the elderly under the benchmark model, and estimates the impact of income inequality on informal care of the elderly. The results show that the logarithm of family income, financial support provided by pensions or children, widowhood, disability, etc., significantly affect positively the benchmark amount of informal care for the elderly, while the provision of health education in the community significantly reduces the baseline amount of informal care. In terms of specific effects, the overall impact of income inequality reached 76.86%, of which the positive spillover effect of income inequality contributed to 88.66%. In terms of the unilateral effect of the degree of influence, the positive spillover effect of income inequality is as high as 58.12%, the negative crowding-out effect is 33.33%, and the net effect is 24.79%. Group heterogeneity under gender and regional characteristics is small, but with the increase in disability, the net effect of income inequality shows a downward trend. Therefore, based on the income inequality formation mechanism, and with the guidance of improving the care for the elderly, it proposes policy recommendations such as reducing income inequality, optimizing the supply of formal care resources, and strengthening institutional guarantees.

     

/

返回文章
返回