1672-8505

CN 51-1675/C

周翔宇. 明代经学研究史述论[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 37(5): 9-16. DOI: 10.19642/j.issn.1672-8505.2018.05.002
引用本文: 周翔宇. 明代经学研究史述论[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 37(5): 9-16. DOI: 10.19642/j.issn.1672-8505.2018.05.002
ZHOU Xiang-yu. A Historical Review of Studies on Confucian Classics in the Ming Dynasty[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences) , 2018, 37(5): 9-16. DOI: 10.19642/j.issn.1672-8505.2018.05.002
Citation: ZHOU Xiang-yu. A Historical Review of Studies on Confucian Classics in the Ming Dynasty[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences) , 2018, 37(5): 9-16. DOI: 10.19642/j.issn.1672-8505.2018.05.002

明代经学研究史述论

A Historical Review of Studies on Confucian Classics in the Ming Dynasty

  • 摘要: 对明代经学的研究大体可分为两个阶段。第一个阶段为清代。清人对明代经学的认识以负面评价为主,其程度也由清初的有针对性的批判、清中期的全面否定、晚清的蔑视而不断加深。第二个阶段为近现代。近现代学者对明代经学的认识既受清人负面评价的深刻影响,也逐渐转向以积极、肯定的态度看待明代经学。无论是将明代经学视作宋学的余波加以否定,还是将其视作清学的滥觞而加以肯定,都不是全面、客观的态度。绵延近三百年的明代经学,有其独立的学术特点和学术价值,今后的明代经学研究应该就明代经学自身来进行研究。

     

    Abstract: The study of Confucian classics in the Ming Dynasty can be divided into two stages. The first stage is the Qing Dynasty, during which the scholars had a negative assessment of the Confucian classicsin the Ming Dynasty. They started to criticize in the early Qing Dynasty, show negation in the middle Qing Dynasty, and contempt in the late Qing Dynasty. The second stage is modern times, where scholars got influences from the Qing Dynasty, but gradually developed a positive attitude and appraised the Confucian classics in the Ming Dynasty.It is not a comprehensive and objective attitude to deny the Confucian classics of the Ming Dynasty as the after wave of the Song studies or to affirm them as the origin of the Qing studies.The 300-year long study of the Ming Dynasty classics has its own independent academic characteristics and values. The future study of the Ming Dynasty Confucian classics should be based on the study of the Ming Dynasty Confucian classics itself.

     

/

返回文章
返回