1672-8505

CN 51-1675/C

方乐坤. 精神利益保护决定民事责任法不可替代[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 34(2): 78-84.
引用本文: 方乐坤. 精神利益保护决定民事责任法不可替代[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 34(2): 78-84.
FANG Le-kun. Protecting Mental Interests Making the Civil Liability Law Irreplaceable[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences) , 2015, 34(2): 78-84.
Citation: FANG Le-kun. Protecting Mental Interests Making the Civil Liability Law Irreplaceable[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences) , 2015, 34(2): 78-84.

精神利益保护决定民事责任法不可替代

Protecting Mental Interests Making the Civil Liability Law Irreplaceable

  • 摘要: 随着现代社会保障体系的建立,民事责任法面临着存在必要性的质疑,从而似乎罹于一场空前的“生存危机”。然而,现代社会保障体系不能解决人的精神利益保护问题。精神利益保护决定民事责任法具有不可替代性。民事责任法以其道德本性为存在依据;背离道德原则对民事责任法进行解释的理论均有成立障碍;现代社会救济立法理论和实践均难以否定民事责任追偿机制及其固有功能。

     

    Abstract: With the modern social security system being established, the civil liability law has been questioned for its necessity of existence, and thereby suffered from an unparalleled "survival crisis" seemingly. However, the modern social security system cannot resolve the problem of people's mental interests protecting. Mental interests protecting makes the civil liability law irreplaceable. The civil liability law lies in its morality nature; any theory could not justify itself when it interprets civil liability law against morality principle; both the modern social remedy theory and its practice are not able to deny civil liability law's repaying mechanism and its inherent function.

     

/

返回文章
返回