1672-8505

CN 51-1675/C

张一玮. 对现代文学中住宅空间及其经验的三种文学批评思路[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 35(2): 22-26.
引用本文: 张一玮. 对现代文学中住宅空间及其经验的三种文学批评思路[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 35(2): 22-26.
ZHANG Yi-wei. Residential Spaces and Experience in Modern Literature: Three Methods in Literary Criticism[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences) , 2016, 35(2): 22-26.
Citation: ZHANG Yi-wei. Residential Spaces and Experience in Modern Literature: Three Methods in Literary Criticism[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences) , 2016, 35(2): 22-26.

对现代文学中住宅空间及其经验的三种文学批评思路

Residential Spaces and Experience in Modern Literature: Three Methods in Literary Criticism

  • 摘要: 现代文学作品中的住宅空间及其经验构成了文学文本主题、风格、叙事方式和文化内涵的可能性。文学批评者可借助社会文化、符号和群体心理三个方面的探讨,结合恩格斯、列斐伏尔、福柯、鲍德里亚和巴什拉等有关空间与空间经验的论述,形成三种行之有效的批评思路。借助这些思路和理论资源,文学批评者能够对现代文学史上的相关作品进行重新评估。

     

    Abstract: Residential spaces and experience in modern literature constitute the possibility of subject, style, narration and cultural connotations in literature. Literary critics can create three effective methods of criticism by discussing theories of Engels, Lefebvre, Foucault, Baudrillard and Bachelard in dimensions of culture, symbol and group psychology. With these resources, ideas and theories, literary critics can re-evaluate the literature texts related to residential spaces and experience in history of modern literature.

     

/

返回文章
返回