1672-8505

CN 51-1675/C

石魏. 刑事速裁程序存在的问题及完善建议——兼论刑事速裁程序与轻刑快审程序之异同[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 34(6): 48-53.
引用本文: 石魏. 刑事速裁程序存在的问题及完善建议——兼论刑事速裁程序与轻刑快审程序之异同[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 34(6): 48-53.
SHI Wei. The Existing Problems and Perfection Suggestions of Criminal Immediate Judgment Procedure——Also on the Similarities and Differences Between Criminal Immediate Judgment Procedure and Quick Trial Procedure of Minor Criminal Cases[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences) , 2015, 34(6): 48-53.
Citation: SHI Wei. The Existing Problems and Perfection Suggestions of Criminal Immediate Judgment Procedure——Also on the Similarities and Differences Between Criminal Immediate Judgment Procedure and Quick Trial Procedure of Minor Criminal Cases[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences) , 2015, 34(6): 48-53.

刑事速裁程序存在的问题及完善建议——兼论刑事速裁程序与轻刑快审程序之异同

The Existing Problems and Perfection Suggestions of Criminal Immediate Judgment Procedure——Also on the Similarities and Differences Between Criminal Immediate Judgment Procedure and Quick Trial Procedure of Minor Criminal Cases

  • 摘要: 在部分地区试行的刑事案件速裁程序在实践中节约了司法资源、提升了诉讼效率,但也暴露出一些问题:刑事速裁程序适用范围过窄,被害人权益保障不完善,法律援助值班律师职责不明,司法行政机关不履行职责无惩戒措施,庭审流程不明确等。对此,文章提出了具体的措施,为刑事诉讼的进一步完善提供参考。

     

    Abstract: The trial immediate judgment procedure of criminal cases practiced in some areas has saved judicial resources and improved the efficiency of the lawsuit. But some problems arise accordingly like: too limited the application scope; imperfect protection of victims' rights and interests; obscurity in legal aid lawyers' responsibilities; no disciplinary measures for judicial and administrative authorities' negative act; ambiguity in trial procedure and so on. This paper puts forward some specific measures, expecting to provide some reference for the perfection of the system in practice.

     

/

返回文章
返回